Budding designer Lola Nolan doesn’t believe in fashion . . . she believes in costume. The more expressive the outfit -- more sparkly, more fun, more wild -- the better. But even though Lola’s style is outrageous, she’s a devoted daughter and friend with some big plans for the future. And everything is pretty perfect (right down to her hot rocker boyfriend) until the dreaded Bell twins, Calliope and Cricket, return to the neighborhood.
When Cricket -- a gifted inventor -- steps out from his twin sister’s shadow and back into Lola’s life, she must finally reconcile a lifetime of feelings for the boy next door.
So, I've wanted this book since I read Anna and the French Kiss. And based on Anna and the reviews I've read of it, it was pretty much what I expected it to be: a drama-filled, very very cute story about costumes and moons and boyfriends and the boy next door.
Writing
If I was asked to describe Perkins's writing style in one word, the first that would pop to mind is: addicting. Very, very addicting. I read both Lola and Anna in one day(clarification--I didn't read both of them in the same day, I read each of them in one day). There's just something about her writing and her story that makes you have to keep reading until the very end. And that's a great quality.
However, the second word that would come to mind is not so much an adjective as a noun: capitals.
They're really my major qualm with the writing in general. The capitals. There were a lot of them in Anna, and there are a lot of them in Lola, and I they just make it harder for me to take what's happening seriously when I feel like I'm being shouted at. Most of the phrases in capitals would've sounded much, much better in either normal text or italics. I'm hoping she switches to italics in Isla's story, because the capitals are really my only problem with Perkins's writing. For the most part, I think she's got a fun, enchanting, addictive writing style that really brings her story to life.
Characters
Ah, the characters. Some stories are much more plot-focused, but this one was definitely about the characters. I want to talk about all of them, but since I don't want to be here all day, I'm going to keep most of them short.
Calliope: Really liked her. Felt bad for her, also. And I was on her side when she told Lola to stop stringing Cricket along.
Max: Really disliked him. Did not understand what Lola saw in, or loved about, this douchebag. He treated her like a kid and hated her friends and family.
Nathan & Andie: Sometimes I liked them, sometimes their protectiveness went a little overboard and frustrated me, particularly with Nathan. But overprotective parents are better than parents who don't give a shit, I suppose.
Lindsay: I liked her. She was fun and nice and reasonable, something Lola desperately needed in a best friend.
Anna and St. Clair: Um . . . Anna and St. Clair! I was so excited to read about them in here, but I was even more excited when they turned out to actually have a role in the story. They weren't just fleetingly mentioned, they were actually major side characters. And I loved them. It's funny, in Anna and the French Kiss, while there were sometimes I really liked Anna, there were sometimes I really disliked her, but in Lola, I loved her. And of course, St. Clair. I adore St. Clair.
Cricket: Cricket. What do you say about Cricket?
He's sweet, adorable, awkward, cute, funny, loyal, amazing, etc. I have come to the conclusion that Stephanie Perkins's greatest strength is creating male characters that I fall in love with. I fell in love with St. Clair in Anna and the French Kiss, and I fell in love with Cricket in Lola and the Boy Next Door. They are very different types of boys, but both lovable in their own way. Cricket was just this . . . this joy, this type of person that you would always want to be around who would never hurt you and always care about you. He's the boyfriend of your dreams without being that "hot and unattainable" type that is often featured in YA today. I loved Cricket, pure and simple. Loved him.
Lola: I . . . had really conflicting feelings about our narrator here.
There were some times that I really liked her. She had some good lines, and there were some really sweet moments with her and Cricket. But a lot of the time I was really upset with her and the decisions she was making. Mainly, stringing Cricket along like she did. She very clearly led him on, but kept pulling back and saying she was with Max and that she loved Max which as I stated before makes no sense because Max is a douchebag. And she got all hurt and offended when Calliope called her out on it when the fact is it's true. There were also times when she got so paranoid or jealous and so easily blew things out of proportion, kinda like Anna in her book. I've come to the conclusion that the reason I loved Anna in this book is because now that she has no one to be jealous of she's a really awesome person. I hope Lola becomes this awesome person.
Plot
Now, I must be honest. I'm a bit biased here. See, I'm not a big fan of general fiction drama. Drama in plots involving magic and other worlds and all that shit? Fine. But even though I know it happens every day, "real life" drama in general fiction books often comes off, to me, as . . . somewhat petty, I guess. So, yeah. I'm biased.
And if I'm being honest, I feel like this book could've been considerably shorter if some of the more pointless drama had been cut out. There was some very necessary drama, but some of it just didn't need to be there.
But despite what it might sound like, I did like the plot. I also liked a lot of the subtle messages throughout the book, and I loved all the stuff with the moon and the stars. Something that did bug me, though, was the the pre-existing Cricket/Lola drama.
See, from the way Lola was reacting to them, I thought he'd done something terrible. They'd gotten together and he'd cheated on her. He'd killed her dog. He'd told her she was a horrible person and never wanted to talk to her again. When I found out what it actually was, it was just . . . anti-climactic. I was just thinking, That's what all the fuss was about? I mean, I get why she'd be upset, just not why she'd be as upset as she was.
However. Overall, I did like the plot. The overwhelming cuteness put a smile on my face, and that is something most books cannot do.
Overall
Like I said before, this book is pretty much what I expected. Melodramatic and cute and sweet and something that leaves you beaming and wishing for your own happy-endings and your own Crickets and St. Clairs when you're done.
Four stars.
Showing posts with label romantic comedy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label romantic comedy. Show all posts
Monday, October 10, 2011
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Anna and the French Kiss
Anna is looking forward to her senior year in Atlanta, where she has a great job, a loyal best friend, and a crush on the verge of becoming more. Which is why she is less than thrilled about being shipped off to boarding school in Paris - until she meets Etienne St. Clair: perfect, Parisian (and English and American, which makes for a swoon-worthy accent), and utterly irresistible. The only problem is that he's taken, and Anna might be, too, if anything comes of her almost-relationship back home.
As winter melts into spring, will a year of romantic near - misses end with the French kiss Anna - and readers - have long awaited?
I heard a lot of amazing things about this book, so I was excited to read it. Obviously, as my rating indicates, I enjoyed it. But I did have some problems, and I'm going to list them first and get it over with.
1) The Caps Lock. For those of you who've read it, I need say no more. For those who haven't . . . DO ANYONE OF YOU ENJOY FEELING LIKE YOU'RE BEING SHOUTED AT THE ENTIRE BOOK?!(WHY CAN'T WE ALL JUST USE INTERROBANGS?!)
2) The name-change, and then how she kept using his last name then his first. It confused and annoyed me.
3) I felt like they were going in circles with their relationship. Like the same three steps kept happening over and over again and it took them the whole book to break free of the cycle: be friendly, start to get friendlier, suddenly become awkward turtles around one another/have big blow out/ignore each other completely. And I felt like so many times their feelings for each other were made so painfully obvious that the fact that they didn't realize how the other felt forced me to believe they were both so painfully dumb.
4) I feel like Mer got over it too quickly. I know, I know, they had time to simmer, and she was nasty the first day it happened, but after Anna apologized it was just . . . okay again. Eh. I dunno.
5) I always read Mer's name like Purr.
6) Anna.
I saved the biggest one for last.
See, I . . . I had mixed feelings about Anna.
Sometimes I really liked her. I liked her brand of humor, I liked the way she acted with Bridgette when they were friendly, I liked how she cared for Etienne and got him out during Thanksgiving break. I liked her obsession with films and film criticism. And that wasn't it. There were a lot of moments here where I really liked her.
But there were a lot of moments where I really wanted to smack her.
On the one hand, I do ask myself this: if I were her, would I react any differently? Would I be any less petty, or jealous? Would I be any less hormonal or blind?
The answer is probably no. But the thing about book characters is they're not usually supposed to depict a teen to the point where it's painful, because frankly, the average teen can get pretty damn annoying.
Anna's jealousy. That really bothered me. I get being jealous, it happens to all of us, but she got so ridiculously jealous over the smallest things, even before she had any sort of claim to St. Clair, and to me, it just made her seem really clingy and petty.
I felt like whenever St. Clair tried to be nice to her, she started yelling at him. And there were sometimes she started just yelling at people who didn't deserve it the slightest bit, and it got me so mad because I felt like she was fucking up her own relationships on purpose and then complaining about it.
Also. I could try and count the number of times she described St. Clair as beautiful, but frankly, that would be tiresome, and I'm . . . tired. But while it's certainly better than the "glorious" SMeyer seems to favor, after a while I was just thinking, Alright, I've got the point, he's short and ridiculously gorgeous.
And just . . . just overall, while sometimes I really liked Anna, by the end I was just kind of wondering what he saw in her that made him choose her over, say, Mer, who was probably a better person than Anna.
BUT NOW TO THE POSITIVES.
Etienne St. Claire.
'Nuff said?
Think so.
Labels:
adorable,
four stars,
love triangle,
Paris,
romantic comedy,
Stephanie Perkins,
sweet
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











